Renewable Energy Investor Reporting Platform Covenant, DSCR and P90 Data, Audit-Ready

Who this is for: UAE asset owners, funds and developers reporting to lenders and investors on project-financed renewable plants with covenants. Less suited to a single system with no project debt or financing obligations.

Four connected capability areas: (1) Covenant and DSCR dashboards. (2) P90 versus actual. (3) Covenant risk alerts. (4) Audit-ready lender packs.

Performance reporting is operational - generation, performance ratio and availability for owners, offtakers and regulators. Investor reporting is financial - DSCR, covenants, P90 versus actual and the lender packs project finance requires.

They draw on the same generation data and often connect, but they answer different audiences: performance reporting is the operational picture, investor reporting is the lender and covenant picture. This page is the financial, covenant side.

No. The financial model - usually in Excel - remains the source of the project's financing assumptions and structure, and you keep it. The software works with the model rather than replacing it.

It takes the model's structure and the live generation and revenue data and calculates the covenant position and reporting from them, so the model's assumptions meet actual performance automatically. The model stays authoritative; the software operationalises it for reporting.

DSCR is usually only calculated when a report is due, so a drift toward the covenant floor is seen late.

The software calculates DSCR and other covenants continuously from live revenue, debt service and reserve data against the model, so the covenant position is always current. That continuous view is what makes early warning possible rather than a period-end surprise.

The software does not prevent or cure a breach - that is a commercial and lender matter - but it gives the early warning and the evidenced data to manage one.

A covenant drifting toward its threshold is flagged ahead of time, and when reporting a tight or breached position the pack is accurate and traceable. Managing the covenant relationship and any waiver stays with you and your lenders; the software gives the visibility and the defensible numbers.

Investor reporting sits on the data and the model.

Data - it takes generation and availability from performance reporting, asset monitoring and SCADA, and revenue from PPA billing and accounting.

Model - it works with your project financial model to compute covenants and P90 comparisons. Integration approach is scoped during discovery based on what you are already running, and we do not ask you to replace anything that works.

Discovery runs two to three weeks. Working with your finance team, we map your covenant and reporting obligations, the financial model and how reporting is met today. Output is a report covering current-state map, gap analysis, recommended workflow, integration scope and a fixed-price build proposal.

A core build runs from discovery completion, with covenant dashboards and P90 comparison first and alerts and lender packs after. Pricing varies by the number of projects, covenant complexity and integration scope, so a bracket is not published; discovery produces a fixed-price proposal with no obligation to proceed.

Funds and developers usually hold several project-financed plants, each with its own covenants and lenders.

The software reports per project against each one's covenants and rolls up to a portfolio view, so a fund sees both the individual covenant positions and the whole portfolio. Each project's lender pack is produced in its own required format.