Issuer Disclosure Software Get Material Developments From Subsidiary Contract to Market Announcement Without Delay
Custom issuer disclosure software for Saudi listed companies and their groups. The CMA's continuing obligations require material developments to be disclosed to the Authority and the public without delay, in Arabic and English, through the official channels - and in June 2026 the CMA fined an issuer for disclosing two material subsidiary contracts late, one of them valued at SAR 1.52 billion. The failure in cases like that is rarely legal judgement; it is the pipeline. A contract signed inside a subsidiary has to surface, be assessed and reach the market while the clock runs. We build that pipeline as a system; materiality judgements and the announcements themselves stay with your governance team and advisers.
Why disclosure failures start inside the group, not the boardroom
No listed company decides to disclose late. What happens instead is structural: the development occurs two levels down, in a subsidiary whose commercial team has signed a significant contract and moved on. By the time it reaches the company secretary, the market clock has been running for days - and the continuing obligations measure from the development, not from the moment head office found out.
Subsidiaries sign, the parent learns late
The June 2026 fine involved subsidiary contracts, one worth SAR 1.52 billion. Material developments born inside operating companies have no reliable route to the disclosure function, so surfacing depends on someone thinking to mention it.
The materiality call is made but not evidenced
Someone assessed the development and decided. But the basis, the participants and the timestamp live in a meeting nobody minuted, so when the CMA asks why an announcement came when it did, the record is reconstruction.
Without delay meets a multi-day relay
Subsidiary to group legal to company secretary to committee to drafting to translation to publication - each handoff reasonable, the total indefensible. The rule measures the whole relay, not any single leg.
Bilingual, on the record, under pressure
Announcements go to the market in Arabic and English through the official channel, and the sequence has to be provable afterwards. Assembled over email at speed, the evidence of what happened when is the first casualty.
The pipeline from development to announcement
Four capability areas that turn a fragile relay into a controlled, timestamped pipeline, fitted to your group structure and sitting alongside the contract, board and IR tools you already run.
Material event register with group capture
Structured intake routes from every subsidiary - contract thresholds, event types, escalation triggers agreed with your governance team - so a significant development surfaces the day it happens, not the week after.
Materiality review workflow
Each surfaced event routed to the people who make the call, with the assessment basis, the participants and the decision recorded and timestamped - whether the outcome is announce, monitor or not material.
Disclosure clock and approval tracker
From the moment a development is logged, the elapsed time is visible against the without-delay standard, with drafting, translation and approval steps tracked so the relay is managed rather than hoped through.
Announcement evidence pack
The Arabic and English versions, the approvals, the publication reference and the full timeline held per announcement - so the answer to why it was announced when it was is an export, not an inquest.
The value of one subsidiary contract whose late disclosure drew a CMA fine in June 2026. The fine itself was SAR 40,000; the message was not about the amount. It was that the Authority measures the gap between the development and the announcement, wherever in the group the development happened.
Your disclosure pipeline at a glance.
A gauge view shows the pipeline position. Events surfaced same-day, reviews completed on clock and announcements fully evidenced tell the board what the CMA would find, before it looks.
Discuss your disclosure platformWhy listed groups invest in disclosure control.
The standing rules and the enforcement climate behind them.
Talk to us about issuer disclosure software.
A short call surfaces whether a custom disclosure platform makes sense for you. Best positioned for Saudi listed companies and groups with operating subsidiaries, where material developments are born away from the disclosure function - and for issuers on both the Main Market and Nomu, since the ad-hoc disclosure duty applies in full to each. A single-entity issuer with few material events is well served by a disciplined manual process, and we will say so. We build the pipeline, workflow and evidence system; we are not a law firm, an investor relations consultancy, or a compliance adviser. What counts as material, the content of announcements, and the disclosure decisions themselves stay with your board, governance team and advisers, and publication happens through the official channels as it does today. BY BANKS is an independent software engineering company: we design and build the platform and hand it over, your team operates it. Authority, exchange and platform names on this page are referenced descriptively to describe scope, and imply no affiliation, endorsement, or approval. Rules and figures are point-in-time. This is not legal or compliance advice.
How issuer disclosure software works for a Saudi listed group
The detail behind the headline - from group-wide event capture and the materiality workflow, through the disclosure clock, to the evidence pack. Pipeline and evidence, not materiality judgements and not announcement drafting.
What changes, in practical terms
We do not judge materiality, draft announcements, or advise on the rules. The system surfaces the events, runs the workflow and keeps the record; the decisions stay with your board, company secretary and advisers - made earlier, on complete information.
The detailed questions Saudi issuers ask us
Expand each to see how bespoke disclosure software actually works.
What does issuer disclosure software actually cover?
Who this is for: Saudi listed companies and groups with operating subsidiaries, on the Main Market or Nomu, where material developments are born away from the disclosure function. A single-entity issuer with few material events does not need it, and we will say so.
Four connected areas: (1) A material event register with structured capture from across the group. (2) A materiality review workflow with recorded decisions. (3) A disclosure clock and approval tracker. (4) An announcement evidence pack. It runs and evidences the pipeline; it does not judge or draft.
How does capture from subsidiaries actually work?
Your governance team defines the triggers - contract value thresholds, event categories, counterparty types - and each subsidiary gets a structured intake route: a short form, an integration from their contract system, or both.
The design goal is that surfacing stops depending on a commercial manager's instinct for what head office needs to know. If a contract crosses the threshold, it arrives in the register the day it is signed, with the basics attached - and the June 2026 enforcement is precisely the failure mode this removes.
Does the platform decide what is material?
No, and this matters. Materiality under the continuing obligations is a judgement for your board, disclosure committee and advisers, made against the rules and the company's circumstances.
What the platform does is make sure that judgement happens early, on complete information, and leaves a record: who assessed the event, on what basis, when, and what was decided - including the decisions not to announce, which need evidencing just as much when the CMA asks later.
How does the disclosure clock work?
From the moment an event enters the register, elapsed time is visible against the without-delay standard - through review, decision, drafting, translation and approval to publication. Stalled steps escalate before they become the story.
The point is managerial rather than legal: the rule measures the whole relay from development to announcement, so the group needs one view of where every live event sits in that relay, not six inboxes each holding a leg of it.
Does it publish announcements or connect to the exchange systems?
No. Publication happens through the official channels by your authorised people, exactly as it does today, and announcement content is drafted by your team and advisers.
The platform manages everything around that act: the bilingual drafts and their approvals, the publication reference once made, and the end-to-end timeline. The market-facing step stays official; the internal pipeline behind it becomes controlled and provable.
Does it help with periodic reporting too, or only material events?
The core is the ad-hoc pillar - material developments, where the without-delay standard bites and the June 2026 fine landed. That is where a pipeline failure is most expensive.
The same calendar and approval machinery extends naturally to periodic obligations - interim and annual reporting deadlines, board report milestones - as a scheduled layer on the same system. Whether that is in scope is a discovery decision, not a constraint.
What does this sit alongside in a typical group?
Disclosure control sits between group operations and the governance function.
Contract and legal systems - subsidiary contract platforms and legal registers feed the event capture rather than being replaced.
Board and IR tooling - board portals and IR calendars stay in place; the platform feeds them a controlled pipeline. Integration approach is scoped during discovery, and we do not ask you to replace tools that work.
How long to go live, and what does it cost?
A scoping phase maps your group structure, where material developments arise, how they surface today and where the relay loses time. It produces a current-state map, gap analysis, recommended scope, integration scope and a fixed-price build proposal.
A core build runs from there, with the event register and capture routes first, then the review workflow, clock and evidence pack. Pricing varies by scope and group complexity, so a bracket is not published; scoping produces a fixed-price proposal with no obligation to proceed.
How each role experiences the change
Different roles feel disclosure control differently. Custom software works when it reduces friction for each one.
Company secretary
Material developments arrive as structured events on day zero instead of corridor conversations on day four, with the whole relay visible and owned.
Disclosure committee
Every assessment made on complete information and recorded with its basis - including the decisions not to announce, which are the hardest to evidence later.
Investor relations
Announcements that arrive through a managed pipeline with time to draft properly in both languages, rather than as a fire drill at 8am.
Board and audit committee
Disclosure health as a standing metric - events surfaced, clocks met, records complete - in a market where foreign institutional scrutiny is rising.
Questions We Get Asked
Who is issuer disclosure software for?
Saudi listed companies and groups with operating subsidiaries, on the Main Market or Nomu, where material developments are born away from the disclosure function. A single-entity issuer with few material events is well served by a disciplined manual process, and we'll say so.
What problem does it actually solve?
The pipeline failure behind most late disclosures: a development happens inside a subsidiary and surfaces at head office days later, while the without-delay clock runs from the development itself. The June 2026 CMA fine over two subsidiary contracts, one worth SAR 1.52 billion, is the pattern exactly.
Does it decide what's material?
No. Materiality is your board's, committee's and advisers' judgement. The platform surfaces events early, routes the assessment, and records who decided what, when and on what basis - including decisions not to announce.
Does it publish to the market?
No. Publication happens through the official channels by your authorised people, and announcements are drafted by your team and advisers. The platform manages the bilingual drafts, approvals, publication reference and end-to-end timeline around that act.
How do subsidiary events get captured?
Structured intake routes per subsidiary - value thresholds, event categories and escalation triggers your governance team defines, via short forms or integrations from contract systems - so surfacing stops depending on someone thinking to mention it.
Does it cover periodic reporting as well?
The core is material-event disclosure, where the without-delay standard bites. The same calendar and approval machinery extends to interim and annual reporting milestones if scoped in during discovery.
What does it sit alongside?
Contract and legal systems feed the capture; board portals and IR calendars stay in place and receive a controlled pipeline. Integration is scoped during discovery - we don't ask you to replace tools that work.
What does it cost and how long does it take?
A scoping phase produces a current-state map, gap analysis, recommended scope and a fixed-price build proposal. The event register and capture routes come first, then the review workflow, clock and evidence pack. Pricing varies by group complexity; scoping gives a fixed price with no obligation to proceed.
Let's Discuss Your Project
Fill in the form, message us on WhatsApp, or send an email.
Quick Assistance
Chat with us directly on WhatsApp.
Open WhatsApp →Email Us
Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo & more.
Choose your email app →BY BANKS L.L.C-FZ
License No. 2425027.01
Meydan Free Zone, Dubai, UAE
Procurement-ready · UAE registered